New research has revealed that the growth of the Antarctic ice sheet was crucial in triggering the longer, more intense glacial cycles of the mid-Pleistocene, reshaping our understanding of global climate dynamics.
Recent collaborative research led by Professor An Zhisheng from the Institute of Earth Environment of the Chinese Academy of Sciences has highlighted the crucial role of the Antarctic ice sheet’s growth and the expansion of Southern Hemisphere sea ice in initiating the mid-Pleistocene climate transition (MPT). The study also demonstrates how the uneven development of polar ice sheets influences the global climate.
The MPT refers to a shift in Earth’s climate system between about ~1.25–0.7 million years ago, marking a shift to more pronounced and regular glacial-interglacial cycles.
While providing insight into the rapid expansion of the Northern Hemisphere ice sheet since the mid-Pleistocene, this study also challenges numerous hypotheses regarding the origin and mechanisms behind the MPT.
Results of the research were published in the recent issue of Science, entitled “Mid-Pleistocene climate transition triggered by Antarctic ice sheet growth.”
Due to the importance of the MPT for the evolution of Earth’s ice sheet dynamics over the last ~1.25 million years, such hypotheses have been debated and discussed frequently in the journals Nature and Science over the last decades.
Contributions to Climate Science
“This study contributes to our understanding of the question ‘What causes ice ages?’ —one of the 125 frontier scientific problems raised by Science/AAAS in 2021,” said Professor An, also a member of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) and Foreign Associate of the National Academy of Sciences, USA.
This work also illustrates how processes in the Earth system define and change characteristics of glacial-interglacial cycles, their dynamics, and their length.
Integrating geological records with numerical climate simulations, this study reveals the history of the asymmetric evolution of ice sheets in both hemispheres and the associated response of the Earth’s climate system.
The findings indicate that 2–1.25 million years ago, the ongoing growth of the Antarctic ice sheet and the associated expansion of sea ice in the Southern Hemisphere triggered a temperature drop and water vapor boost in the Northern Hemisphere through the modified cross-equatorial pressure gradient and meridional overturning circulation.
Asymmetric Impact on Global Climate
These changes thus fostered development of the Arctic ice sheet and ultimately caused a shift in Earth’s glacial cycles from ~40,000 years to ~100,000 years.
By examining the changes in ice volume across both hemispheres, this work highlights the profound impact of the asymmetric evolution of polar ice sheets upon global climate, particularly on the climate of the Northern Hemisphere.
“The finding of the study that this asymmetry could trigger powerful positive feedbacks that could induce a massive change to Earth’s climate, a point previously unappreciated until now, has important implications for understanding and projecting Earth’s climate under greenhouse warming,” said Dr. CAI Wenju, Fellow of the Australian Academy of Science, who noted that the study is an example of Chinese scientists taking the lead in solving global questions in frontier science.
Prof. An indicated it was urgent to quantitatively assess links between asymmetric bi-hemispheric ice sheet melting and global climate change. He suggested doing so could advance our ability “to predict future climate change and response of the Earth System to the changes in polar ice sheets.”
Reference: “Mid-Pleistocene climate transition triggered by Antarctic Ice Sheet growth” by Zhisheng An, Weijian Zhou, Zeke Zhang, Xu Zhang, Zhonghui Liu, Youbin Sun, Steven C. Clemens, Lixin Wu, Jiaju Zhao, Zhengguo Shi, Xiaolin Ma, Hong Yan, Gaojun Li, Yanjun Cai, Jimin Yu, Yuchen Sun, Siqi Li, Yu’ao Zhang, Christian Stepanek, Gerrit Lohmann, Guocheng Dong, Hai Cheng, Yu Liu, Zhangdong Jin, Tao Li, Yifei Hao, Jing Lei and Wenju Cai, 1 August 2024, Science.
DOI: 10.1126/science.abn4861
This research was a collaboration with international teams including the CAS Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, the University of Hong Kong, the British Antarctic Survey, Laoshan Laboratory, the Alfred Wegener Institute, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Nanjing University, Brown University, Beijing Normal University, Ocean University of China, and Australian National University.
3 Comments
Describing an effect not a cause. Is it a decrease in output from the sun or chemicals in the atmosphere etc???
Just shows that the more we learn, the less we can be sure about the phony concensus on climate change. Like the human brain, climate is a phenomenon of such infinite complexity that we will probably never understand its true dynamics. Assuming this reasonabe assumption to be correct, shouldn’t we concentrate more on adaptability and less on catastrophism?
There does seem to be a hidden agenda of prematurely ending the use of fossil fuels, despite the fact that we will eventually have to find (an) alternative source(s). There is no evidence that such a thing as an unrecoverable Tipping Point exists, so any disruptions that the use of fossil fuels may result in will disappear. The problem is progressive politicians trying to force a change before the technology exists to support the alternatives. “No whine before its time.”