Researchers at the University of Virginia have developed a scalable method for fabricating MOF-525, a material that can effectively capture and convert carbon dioxide into useful chemicals. This breakthrough offers a practical solution for large-scale applications in carbon capture and conversion, presenting significant environmental and energy benefits.
Scientists have figured out how to take a miracle material, one capable of extracting value from captured carbon dioxide, and do what no one else has: make it practical to fabricate for large-scale applications. Conducted by researchers at the University of Virginia School of Engineering and Applied Science, the study was published in ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces.
The breakthrough from chemical engineering assistant professor Gaurav “Gino” Giri’s lab group has implications for the cleanup of the greenhouse gas, a major contributor to the climate change dilemma. It could also help solve the world’s energy needs.
The Power of MOF-525
The substance, called MOF-525, is in a class of materials called metal-organic frameworks.
“If you can make these MOFs cover large areas, then new applications become possible, like making a membrane for carbon capture and electrocatalytic conversion all in one system,” Giri said.
Electrocatalytic conversion creates a bridge from renewable energy sources to direct chemical synthesis, taking the burning of carbon dioxide-producing fossil fuels out of the equation.
Advancing Carbon Capture Solutions
What gives MOFs superpowers is their ultra-porous, crystalline structures — 3D networks of minute nanoscale cavities that create vast internal surface area and act like a sponge — that can be designed to trap all sorts of chemical compounds.
Giri’s group reasoned that starting with an inherently scalable synthesis technique — solution shearing — would better their odds. They had already had success shearing simpler MOFs.
In Giri’s process, the MOF’s components are mixed in a solution, and then spread across a substrate with the shearing blade. As the solution evaporates, chemical linkages form the MOF as a thin film on the substrate. Applying MOF-525 in this way produces an all-in-one membrane for carbon trapping and conversion.
Scaling Up for Greater Impact
“The bigger the membrane, the more surface area you have for the reaction, and the more product you could get,” said Prince Verma, a December 2023 Ph.D. graduate from Giri’s lab. “With this process, you can increase the shearing blade width to whatever size you need.”
The team targeted CO2 conversion to demonstrate their solution shearing approach because carbon capture is widely used to reduce industrial emissions or to remove it from the atmosphere — but at a cost to operators with minimal return on the investment: Carbon dioxide has little commercial value and most often winds up stored indefinitely underground.
However, with minimal energy input, using electricity to catalyze a reaction, MOF-525 can take away an oxygen atom to make carbon monoxide — a chemical that is valuable for manufacturing fuels, pharmaceuticals, and other products.
UVA’s Commitment to Green Energy
The process of accelerating reactions through catalysis, especially electrocatalysis, which consumes less energy than reactions driven by heat or pressure, is essential to a green-energy future — so much so that UVA invested $60 million in catalysis study as part of UVA’s Grand Challenges Investments.
For that expertise, Giri collaborated with UVA associate professor of chemistry Charles W. Machan.
“The materials from Gino’s lab help us understand how to enable new, scalable technologies for capture and conversion, which we’re going to need to address the environmental challenges posed by current carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere and rate of emissions,” Machan said.
The researchers published their findings in the American Chemical Society journal Applied Materials and Interfaces.
Reference: “Solution Shearing of Zirconium (Zr)-Based Metal–Organic Frameworks NU-901 and MOF-525 Thin Films for Electrocatalytic Reduction Applications” by Prince K. Verma, Connor A. Koellner, Hailey Hall, Meagan R. Phister, Kevin H. Stone, Asa W. Nichols, Ankit Dhakal, Earl Ashcraft, Charles W. Machan and Gaurav Giri, 13 November 2023, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces.
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.3c12011
Also contributing to the work were Connor A. Koellner, Hailey Hall, Meagan R. Phister, Kevin H. Stone, Asa W. Nichols, Ankit Dhakal and Earl Ashcraft.
The research was supported by the UVA Environmental Institute; the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Catalysis Science Program; the Nanoscale Materials Characterization Facility at UVA; and the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
4 Comments
“However, with minimal energy input, using electricity to catalyze a reaction, MOF-525 can take away an oxygen atom to make carbon monoxide …”
How about a definition of “minimal” or a statement of the actual energy cost to achieve the conversion? How much energy is required to produce the zirconium-based MOF and its substrate? It is so tiresome reading claims that are little more than arm waving about the potential commercial applications when all they are demonstrating is a technological feasibility study. It is perhaps of interest to academics, but for the general reading public concerned about the claims about the dangers of anthropogenic CO2, what is of more interest is the energy costs necessary to implement such technology on a large scale. Studies too numerous to list have failed (such as pyrolitic conversion of organic wastes) to be commercialized because the costs couldn’t be brought down to a level to make the process profitable. Tax subsidies are simply a way of hiding the costs; however, the end-users still pay through the distortion of the economics.
I agree. There are infinite ways to capture and make use of CO2. While the discussion of approach and technique of CO2 capture and conversion is interesting, neglecting the energy requirements to capture the CO2 casts them back into the infinite sea of CO2 capture methods. Energy metrics matter! Without them, why should we care?
“Carbon dioxide has little commercial value and most often winds up stored indefinitely underground.”
Well. not exactly. What about carbonated beverages or dry ice.
With respect to having an effect on the climate the problem remains…storing enough to affect the climate. One ppm represents 7.8 gigatons…7,800 million tons. Scaled up? is only a few million tons. Carbon capture is a scam.